![]() Slow audio Play audio Livres Free o lume heat, fire, flame Slow audio Play audio as mesas the tables Slow audio Play audio o ovo egg Slow audio Play audio O pastel de nata Portuguese custard tart Slow audio Play audio Portimão (noun, genderless) A city in the Algarve. portare, que significa transportar portalmparas, portaequipajes. Componente de palabra procedente del lat. ![]() Informacin sobre porta- en el Diccionario y Enciclopedia En Lnea Gratuito. Gran Diccionario de la Lengua Espaola 2022 Larousse Editorial, S.L. coloquial Protagonista de una pelcula o narracin que el prota fallezca es un hecho inusual la prota acaba casndose con el poli bueno. noun) The Portuguese variant of the French 'crème brûlée', a popular dessert. traducir porta- significado porta- traduccin de porta- Sinnimos de porta-, antnimos de porta-. Prota - significado de prota diccionario prota prota adj./ s. Ementas Menus Frigideira Frying pan férias holiday s, vacation s Slow audio Play audio a laranja orange Slow audio Play audio Os legumes vegetables Slow audio Play audio Leite creme (masc. O nome ou substantivo o tipo de palavras cujo significado determina a realidade. ![]() comer to eat Slow audio Play audio Cozido à Portuguesa A traditional Portuguese stew. Persona que por algunas seales conjetura y predice acontecimientos futuros no hay que ser un profeta para ver que, con estas nubes, llover. noun) Pork sausages, also called 'chorizo' in English. OCULTISMO, RELIGIN Persona que puede predecir el futuro Isaas y Ezequiel son profetas bblicos. Agora now Slow audio Play audio Algarve The southernmost region of Portugal Antes Before Slow audio Play audio batatas fritas fries, chips Slow audio Play audio bebidas drinks, beverages Slow audio Play audio o bife steak bitoque steak with a fried egg on top traditional Portuguese dish Buscar Go get, pick up, fetch, search for Slow audio Play audio caldo verde a traditional Portuguese soup, literal - "green broth" A cerveja Beer Slow audio Play audio Chouriços (masc.
0 Comments
![]() Especially when I need to focus, I want to make the most out of a time saver that can make a difference each day. Although I plan on upgrading to a premium account to potentially get more out of time. Whether I’m spending too much time on a website, or I’m productive doing one task, I can differentiate between the two and make those adjustments.Īt the moment, I’ve only used the basic features of RescueTime. It brings a different perspective on how I utilize my time. When I need to focus on specific tasks, I’ll keep the app turned on when I’m online. In my experience, I’ve used it for quite some time now. Having an app that can keep track of your online activities does come in handy. RescueTime has a lot of neat features to help avoid distractions. Whether that’s meetings, breaks, or going out for a walk, RescueTime can track these activities. RescueTime’s premium subscription automatically prompts you to enter non-productive activities into your dashboard. The goals you set allow you to track your progress daily and receive a weekly summary of your progress. Set aside one hour to write a report or less than a half-hour to go through email. With RescueTime, it’s a “free form” app that allows you to spend time the way you want. You’ll know where your time is spent on websites, apps, and or other distracting browsers that may plunge your productivity. ![]() RescueTime keeps track of every minute of your activity spent on electronic devices. Automatic time trackingĪutomated time tracking eliminates the need to enter your tasks manually. Keep in mind some of these features are included with a premium account (see below for pricing details). More so, to move away from unnecessary distractions. It can help you determine where you spend your time efficiently. RescueTime gives you a helpful screenshot of your tracked time between your productive and distracting time frames. As a result, the app has helped users save hours of their time. RescueTime has addressed some of these issues over the years. These days, the modern-day workplace can be stressful, less productive, and possibly burnout as well. ![]() Number, it was always listed last, in small print, if listed at all. Was Continuous or RMS, but since this was the smallest, least-impressive In 1974, FTC stepped in to make stereo manufacturers clean up their deceptive wattage ratings. Ratings, companies would use all kinds of ratings. This is how it was done in those days: Let the buyerīack in the ’60 s and early ’70 s, before the FTC stepped in (1974) and madeĪll the stereo manufacturers clean up their deceptive advertised wattage Level of distortion? Over what bandwidth? Both channels driven simultaneously 90 watts how? Per channel? 45 per channel, so 90 watts total? At what Particular interest is this ad’s headline, boasting that it’s a “90-Watt” Units a somewhat shaky reputation for inferior sound and questionable quality. Germanium transistors had narrowerīandwidth, less gain and were not particularly reliable, giving the first transistor Early transistor models used germanium transistors, before manufacturers of mainstream electronics and the 500-T was Fisher’s firstĪll-transistor unit. In rough chronological order from oldest to newest, here are our picks for theġ0 (or so) most memorable receivers of the last 50 years: Two-Channelįisher 500-T receiver from around 1965-ish was a hugely important unit in theĮvolution of American hi-fi. We discuss the evolution from tubes to transistors, power ratings and the FTC, social, economic, and demographic changes that have occurred in America since the 1960’s and how this has impacted the receiver market. We cover everything from vintage two-channel to the more recent multi-channel surround AV receivers. The response to the Speakers article was any indication, this one should spark Write, and it’s even more fun to hear the reactions and read the comments. Round-up/historical articles like these are a heckuva lot of fun to Those comments are the very reason we do these articles, so we’d love to hear Neither article is about “the best,”īut we’re sure that won’t stop the flood of how-could-you-this-leave-off comments. Receivers, not necessarily the most influential. Most Influential Speakers of the Last 50 Years.” Instead, we cover the most “memorable” Article will have a slightly different angle than the recent article, “ The 10 |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |